Insights
Blog Case Studies Reports & Ebooks White Papers Newsletter Podcast Infographics Videos
Developer Guides
How to Scrape Restaurant Menus How to Scrape Grocery Stores How to Scrape Alcohol Prices Anti-blocking Best Practices API Integration Guides
Company
Our Story FAQs Contact Us Careers
Legal & Trust
Privacy Policy Terms & Conditions
Free 2026 Food Data Report

50+ pages · 1,000+ data points. Trusted by 500+ companies.

Download free →
Join 5,000+ Subscribers

Monthly insights on food & AI.

Subscribe →
Book a Demo →

You'll receive the case study on your business email shortly after submitting the form.

Resources / Research Report

What Delivery Apps Cost US Restaurants: A Food Delivery Markup Data Scraping Report on In-App vs In-Store Menu Prices

Report Overview

"Break down how much DoorDash is costing my store." That request, from a café franchise in Charlotte, North Carolina, sums up a question thousands of US restaurant operators ask. Delivery apps bring new customers, but commissions take a large share of each order. Many restaurants respond by setting higher menu prices on delivery apps than in their own stores. Customers see the difference, competitors watch it, and operators wonder whether they are charging too much or too little.

This report uses Food Delivery Markup Data Scraping to compare in-app menu prices on DoorDash, Uber Eats and Grubhub with in-store or first-party online prices for the same items at the same restaurants. It covers six US metros, four cuisine groups and more than 2,000 restaurants in the illustrative sample.

Report Overview
Key Highlights

Key Highlights

The median delivery-app markup is 18% over in-store prices for the same item.

Markups vary widely by restaurant type: 8% for some national chains, up to 30% for independent cafés and bakeries.

The same restaurant often prices differently on each app, with gaps of 3 to 6 percentage points between platforms.

Low-price items carry the highest percentage markups, because commissions apply to small baskets too.

About one in five restaurants shows no markup at all, often absorbing the commission or recovering it through fees.

Why Delivery Markups Matter

For restaurant operators

Commission rates on the main US delivery platforms commonly range from about 15% to 30% of the order value, depending on the plan the restaurant chooses. If menu prices on the app are the same as in the store, that commission comes straight out of margin. If prices are set too high, conversion falls and customers switch to a competitor. Knowing what similar restaurants charge on each platform helps operators find the right balance.

For franchise groups

Franchisors want consistent pricing across outlets and platforms. Franchisees often set delivery prices individually, which creates inconsistent customer experiences and makes it hard to measure what delivery really costs the system.

For consultants and investors

Delivery markups reveal pricing power, channel strategy and margin pressure. A brand that keeps a low markup while growing delivery sales may be gaining share at a cost.

Methodology

Markets

The illustrative sample covers six metro areas: New York City, Los Angeles, Chicago, Houston, Atlanta and Charlotte.

Restaurants

Restaurants were selected in four cuisine groups and two ownership types:

Cuisine group Example dishes in the matched basket
Burgers and American Cheeseburger, fries, chicken sandwich, milkshake
Pizza and Italian Large cheese pizza, pepperoni pizza, garlic knots, pasta
Mexican Burrito, tacos (3), chips and salsa, quesadilla
Café and bakery Latte, avocado toast, smoothie, breakfast sandwich
Ownership type Description
National or regional chain 25 or more locations
Independent Single site or small local group

Price sources

  • Delivery platforms. DoorDash, Uber Eats and Grubhub menus, collected at a fixed delivery address near each restaurant.
  • In-store or first-party prices. The restaurant's own website, its own online ordering page or its published menu. Where a restaurant offers first-party online ordering for pickup, that price was used as the in-store reference.

Item matching

Each delivery-app item was matched to the same item on the first-party menu by name, size and description. Only exact matches were kept. Combos and bundles were excluded unless the components were identical.

Markup calculation

For each matched item:

Markup % = (delivery-app item price − in-store item price) ÷ in-store item price × 100

Markups were calculated before delivery fees, service fees, taxes and tips, so they reflect the menu price difference alone.

Collection

Food delivery markup data scraping collected menus in two weekly waves (weekday lunch and weekend evening), because some restaurants adjust availability by daypart. Each observation recorded platform, restaurant, address, item, size, price and collection date.

Key Findings

1. The overall markup

Measure Value
Matched items analysed 41,800
Restaurants with at least 5 matched items 2,140
Median item markup 18%
Middle 50% of markups 10% to 25%
Restaurants with no markup on any platform 21%

Most restaurants charge more on delivery apps than in-store, but there is a meaningful group that does not. Those restaurants either absorb the commission, rely on customer fees charged by the platform, or are on a plan where the economics work without a markup.

2. Markups by cuisine group

Cuisine group Median markup Share of restaurants with markup above 25%
Burgers and American 15% 14%
Pizza and Italian 14% 11%
Mexican 19% 22%
Café and bakery 24% 37%

Cafés and bakeries show the highest markups. Their average order values are low, so a fixed or percentage commission takes a larger share of each order, and operators raise app prices to compensate.

3. Chains versus independents

Ownership type Median markup Price consistency across platforms
National or regional chain 12% High: most items priced the same on all apps
Independent 21% Lower: prices often differ by platform

Chains usually set delivery pricing centrally and can negotiate platform terms, which keeps markups lower and more consistent. Independents set prices individually, often once at onboarding, and rarely revisit them.

4. Markups by metro

Metro Median markup Highest-markup cuisine
New York City 20% Café and bakery
Los Angeles 19% Café and bakery
Chicago 17% Mexican
Houston 16% Café and bakery
Atlanta 17% Mexican
Charlotte 18% Café and bakery

Coastal metros show slightly higher markups, likely reflecting higher operating costs and higher delivery demand.

5. Platform-to-platform differences

Comparison Share of restaurants with different prices for the same item
DoorDash vs Uber Eats 34%
DoorDash vs Grubhub 41%
Uber Eats vs Grubhub 38%

Where prices differ between apps, the gap is usually 3 to 6 percentage points. Operators often set prices once per platform and then forget them, so differences reflect history more than strategy.

6. Item price level drives percentage markup

In-store item price band Median markup
Under $5 27%
$5 to $10 19%
$10 to $20 15%
Over $20 11%

Low-price items such as coffee, sides and drinks carry the highest percentage markups. Main dishes over $20 show the lowest.

7. What a markup means for the customer basket

For a typical two-person delivery order of about $35 in-store value, an 18% menu markup adds roughly $6 before fees. Combined with delivery and service fees, the customer may pay 30% to 50% more than the in-store total. This is one reason first-party ordering and pickup promotions have grown.

Case Example: Estimating What Delivery Costs One Outlet

Using the same method, a single café can estimate its own delivery cost and compare it with local peers:

Step Example value (illustrative)
Monthly delivery-app sales $18,000
Commission rate on current plan 25%
Monthly commission paid $4,500
Café's current app markup 10%
Revenue recovered by markup about $1,640
Net delivery cost after markup about $2,860
Local peer median markup (from data) 24%
Recovered revenue at peer median markup about $3,480

All values illustrative. The calculation helps an operator see whether its markup is in line with local competitors and what a change might recover, before testing the effect on order volume.

Sample Data

The record below shows the structure of one matched observation.

{
  "metro": "Charlotte",
  "restaurant_name": "Example Cafe South End",
  "ownership_type": "independent",
  "cuisine_group": "cafe_bakery",
  "item_name": "Avocado Toast",
  "item_size": "Regular",
  "instore_price_usd": 9.50,
  "instore_price_source": "first_party_online_menu",
  "platform_prices_usd": {
    "doordash": 11.99,
    "ubereats": 11.49,
    "grubhub": 11.99
  },
  "markup_pct": {
    "doordash": 26.2,
    "ubereats": 20.9,
    "grubhub": 26.2
  },
  "collection_date": "2026-10-04",
  "daypart": "weekday_lunch"
}

Recommendations for Restaurant Operators

Based on the patterns in the data, operators can take five practical steps:

  • Set a deliberate markup per platform. Start from your commission rate and local peer medians rather than a single flat increase.
  • Use lower markups on hero items. The items customers compare most, such as a signature burger or a large pizza, influence conversion the most. Keep their markup close to the local median.
  • Recover margin on add-ons. Drinks, sides and extras tolerate higher markups and carry higher margins.
  • Review prices quarterly. Many restaurants set app prices at onboarding and never return to them. A quarterly review against fresh data keeps prices aligned with competitors and costs.
  • Promote first-party ordering. Where your own online ordering is cheaper for customers, tell them. The price gap is a reason for loyal customers to order direct.

Markup Trend Tracking

A single snapshot shows where markups stand today. Monthly food delivery markup data scraping shows how they move. In the illustrative tracking window, the median markup in the sample rose by about one percentage point over six months, with the largest increases among independent cafés. Chains held steady. Tracking these trends helps operators see whether competitors are raising app prices, which can create room to adjust their own prices without losing share.

Month (illustrative) Median markup, chains Median markup, independents
April 12% 20%
June 12% 20%
August 12% 21%
October 12% 21%

How to Use Food Delivery Markup Data

  • Restaurant operators: benchmark your app prices against local peers in the same cuisine and set a deliberate markup per platform.
  • Franchise groups: detect outlets whose app prices differ from brand guidance, and measure channel profitability system-wide.
  • Restaurant consultants: support menu engineering with evidence on what customers pay on each channel.
  • Investors: compare pricing power and channel strategy across listed and private restaurant brands.
  • Delivery platforms and software vendors: understand merchant pricing behaviour by segment.

Limitations

  • The in-store reference uses first-party online menus where available; actual in-store menu-board prices may differ slightly.
  • Markups exclude customer delivery fees, service fees, taxes and tips.
  • Promotions and platform discounts change daily and are tracked separately from base prices.
  • Commission rates vary by restaurant and plan and are not published per restaurant; the case example uses an assumed rate.
  • The sample covers selected metros and cuisines; results may differ elsewhere.

Data Fields Available

Field Description
Restaurant, address, metro Restaurant identity and location
Ownership type and cuisine group For segmentation
Item, size, description As listed on each channel
In-store price and source First-party menu or online ordering price
Platform prices DoorDash, Uber Eats, Grubhub (and others on request)
Markup per platform Calculated percentage
Promotions Active platform or restaurant offers
Collection date and daypart Time context

Conclusion

Delivery apps are now a core sales channel for US restaurants, and menu markups are the main tool operators use to manage their cost. The data shows that markups are common but inconsistent: they vary by cuisine, ownership type, city, item price and even platform. Food delivery markup data scraping replaces guesswork with a clear view of what similar restaurants charge, so operators can price deliberately.

Get a delivery markup benchmark for your market

Food Data Scrape builds custom delivery markup benchmarks for restaurants, franchise groups and consultants across US metros. Share your location, cuisine and competitor set, and we will deliver a sample markup report for your area.

Questions

Frequently Asked Questions

Yes. Provide a list of restaurants or a radius around your outlets, and the comparison is built for that set.

DoorDash, Uber Eats and Grubhub by default, with other regional platforms added on request.

Monthly is enough for most operators. Franchise groups monitoring compliance often track weekly.

We provide the market data and the method. Your own commission rate and sales figures complete the calculation.